🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually bore the burden of her father’s legacy. As the daughter of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the best-known British musicians of the 1900s, her reputation was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of the past.

A World Premiere

In recent months, I contemplated these legacies as I made arrangements to produce the world premiere recording of the composer’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Boasting emotional harmonies, soulful lyricism, and bold rhythms, her composition will offer audiences valuable perspective into how she – a composer during war who entered the world in 1903 – conceived of her world as a artist with mixed heritage.

Shadows and Truth

Yet about legacies. It requires time to adjust, to perceive forms as they really are, to distinguish truth from misrepresentation, and I was reluctant to confront Avril’s past for a period.

I deeply hoped her to be her father’s daughter. In some ways, she was. The idyllic English tones of parental inspiration can be heard in numerous compositions, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only review the titles of her family’s music to see how he heard himself as not only a champion of UK romantic tradition but a representative of the African diaspora.

At this point Samuel and Avril appeared to part ways.

American society evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his compositions rather than the his ethnicity.

Family Background

While he was studying at the renowned institution, Samuel – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – began embracing his African roots. When the poet of color Paul Laurence Dunbar visited the UK in the late 19th century, the aspiring artist eagerly sought him out. He composed this literary work to music and the subsequent year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral composition that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt vicarious pride as white America evaluated the composer by the quality of his art instead of the his race.

Activism and Politics

Fame failed to diminish his beliefs. In 1900, he was present at the First Pan African Conference in England where he met the prominent scholar this influential figure and witnessed a series of speeches, including on the oppression of the Black community there. He remained an advocate throughout his life. He maintained ties with pioneers of civil rights including the scholar and this leader, delivered his own speeches on racial equality, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the American leader while visiting to the presidential residence in the early 1900s. As for his music, reminisced Du Bois, “he established his reputation so prominently as a creative artist that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He passed away in the early 20th century, aged 37. However, how would the composer have made of his child’s choice to travel to this country in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Daughter of Famous Composer shows support to South African policy,” appeared as a heading in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the correct approach”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she backtracked: she did not support with the system “as a concept” and it “should be allowed to run its course, guided by good-intentioned people of every background”. Were the composer more in tune to her father’s politics, or born in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about the policy. Yet her life had protected her.

Background and Inexperience

“I hold a British passport,” she remarked, “and the government agents failed to question me about my ethnicity.” Thus, with her “porcelain-white” appearance (according to the magazine), she moved within European circles, buoyed up by their acclaim for her renowned family member. She presented about her family’s work at the Cape Town university and directed the national orchestra in Johannesburg, programming the inspiring part of her composition, named: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a confident pianist herself, she did not perform as the soloist in her piece. Instead, she consistently conducted as the conductor; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

She desired, in her own words, she “may foster a change”. But by 1954, things fell apart. After authorities discovered her mixed background, she had to depart the land. Her UK document failed to safeguard her, the diplomatic official recommended her departure or face arrest. She came home, feeling great shame as the extent of her innocence dawned. “The realization was a hard one,” she expressed. Increasing her embarrassment was the printing that year of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from the country.

A Common Narrative

Upon contemplating with these legacies, I felt a recurring theme. The narrative of identifying as British until you’re not – which recalls African-descended soldiers who defended the UK throughout the second world war and lived only to be not given their earned rewards. And the Windrush generation,