🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.