🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."